Before American scientist and scholars decide to link the practice of homosexuality to the origins of Africa, we at Afromerica want to be the first to implant thoughts into Black minds that will protect against such fallacies. You see, American trendsetters and gatekeepers, by way of scholars who write our textbooks, publish studies in mainstream media magazines and who televise nationally during prime-time hours, love the powers of implication: whereby they attribute everything negative and immoral to either the behavior of Black-America and/or to the origins of Africa.

For instance, Blacks are connected to drug use, as if drug use and dealing began as a result of our behavior. We are connected to crime, with a strong implication that we are "naturally" criminals. We are connected to high rates of out-of-wed lock pregnancies, as if we are hopeless nymphomaniacs who think of nothing but. Not to mention we have been tied with evilness, wickedness, dirtiness, poverty, witchcraft and any other immoral, despicable lifestyles and behavior. So before [he] the scientist scientifically attempts to relate the practice of homosexuality to some gene found buried deep below the equator on African ground, we will squash it right here.

Think for a moment. As of right now the most ancient record of homosexuality goes back to the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, which are very old Biblical cities dating back even before the white man came about. And if a person decides to believe in the stories of the Bible, they must acknowledge that the deep-toned Hebrew and Hue-toned Black man reigned as supreme during that time. However, one must also realize that the practice of homosexuality was considered immoral and sinful and was punished swiftly. In fact, the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah were burned to hell because of the rumors.

Let us not lose focus here. This is very important. On the other hand, if the Bible were not taken as authentic by scientific standards, then all we really have to go by would be any recorded history of homosexuality in books and ancient writings. From that aspect, it has been rumored that many great Europeans were of homosexual persuasion, like Shakespeare and many kings that ruled in Rome. Not many - if any - rumors are circulating about great African kings who practiced homosexuality amongst the tribe. But if necessary, and in order to protect the moral foundations of the white culture, some scientist will find or fabricate some dirt on one of the kings of Africa. This cannot be counted out as a possibility.

So if scientists are successful in proving that there is no supreme being guiding our lives, then they must adhered to the latter theory of homosexuality, which would make them the originators. However, if they somehow connect homosexuality with ancient African culture, then they would have to acknowledge all that was before him - which is beyond the scope of his knowledge, meaning he does not know. And if he does not know then he could never discount the theory of a supreme being. And this would by all practical logic, place his faith into question.

With his faith in question, the scholar and scientist must rely on fact. And if fact does not present itself he usually resorts to fabrication, such is the beginnings of myths, legends, and fairytales and might it be added, the great works of many Greek and Roman writers, philosophers, and artist.

The Euro-imagination is extremely intelligent. It can implant illusions that have the ability to imitate reality. Look at White Jesus. Look at Hollywood. If they can think it, so it will be. Thus, if they want the world to believe, then they will prove it: first to themselves then to the rest. The unimaginative mind will absorb their illusions and follow the paths set for them because they have not the ability to judge for themselves that the only reality is actually unseen, not in what we see each day.

If we believe in what we see each day, then there is no hope. But if we know that all that came before us and all that is to come are and will forever be unknown, then there will always be hope and the knowledge that nothing is fact. So never believe anything he says or anything you read that he writes or has written. It is all based on what he would rather believe instead of what he actually knows. And because believing is a substantial matter of faith, then if he chooses to believe that which he does not know, this gives us all the more reason to doubt him and trust in the unknown.

If faith is the substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things not seen, and if [his] faith is in question and we willingly believes in what he says he's proved, then all that we will ever know will be exactly he wants us to know, which will be everything we see and not hope for. Though we can never know for sure what we should know, there is one sure way we can find out: If God is an illusion then [he] the scientist is the creator of all things, but if God is real, then homosexuality is a sin.

© 2003 by C R Hamilton